I am frequently surprised at the number of people who believe the Japanese never developed radar during WW II. In fact some of the first radar was developed in Japan by a Dr. Yagi, hence you will find the aerials for many early radar systems referred to as a "Yagi Antennae".
The Japanese military was late to understand the value of radar, but when development was finally undertaken full force, some fairly effective sets were developed and employed during the war. Each known type of Japanese radar is discussed below, and wherever possible a photo demonstrating a type in operational deployment will be shown.
During the war the following radar related installations were formed by the Imperial Army :
|
Tama Army Technology Research Institute formed 11 June 43 for radar research |
|
Army Radio Wave Training Unit formed 12 Feb 44 for training radar operators |
|
Army Radio Wave Weapons Training Department revised 28 Apr 45 |
|
1st Radio Wave Guidance Unit formed 12 Jun 45 |
The Naval Technical Department was in charge of all Navy radar development. Their main establishment would have been in Tokyo, with other facilities constructed as needed.
While the Army did have a radar development program, the Imperial Navy seems to have been the primary developer of Japanese radar. Given the losses that the Navy sustained in part because of US Navy radar, this is somewhat understandable.
|
Became Operational |
June 1943 |
|
War Status |
used operationally in war |
|
Installed |
ground, shore fixed |
|
Purpose |
anti-air |
|
Wavelength |
300 cm |
|
Peak Output |
40 kw |
|
Transmitter |
parallel two wire |
|
Receiver |
UN-954 |
|
Detector |
RE-3 |
|
Detected |
aircraft, group at 250 km, single at 130 km |
|
Weight |
8700 kg |
|
Number Built |
30 |
|
Antennae |
dipole array with mat type reflector, send and receive separate use |
|
Became Operational |
April 1944 |
|
War Status |
used operationally in war |
|
Installed |
ground movable |
|
Purpose |
anti-air |
|
Wavelength |
200 cm and 150 cm |
|
Peak Output |
5 kw |
|
Transmitter |
parallel two wire |
|
Receiver |
UN-954 |
|
Detector |
RE-3 |
|
Detected |
aircraft, group at 100 km, single at 50 km |
|
Weight |
6000 kg |
|
Number Built |
50 |
|
Antennae |
dipole array with mat type reflector, send and receive separate use |
|
Detail of bridge structure of heavy cruiser Myoko at Singapore late in the war, the Type 13 radar mat is visible on top of the foremast |
|
|
Became Operational |
operationally March 1943, experimentally 1941 |
|
War Status |
wide operational use in war |
|
Installed |
ground, surface ship and submarine portable |
|
Purpose |
anti-air |
|
Wavelength |
200 cm |
|
Peak Output |
10 kw |
|
Transmitter |
parallel two wire |
|
Receiver |
UN-954 |
|
Detector |
n/a |
|
Detected |
aircraft, group at 100 km, single at 50 km |
|
Weight |
110 kg |
|
Number Built |
1000 |
|
Antennae |
dipole array with mat type reflector, send and receive common use |
Type 13 sets are known to have been installed on the following ships :
Major Ships
|
1941 |
month unknown |
Oi, Kitagami |
|
1943 |
June |
Katori, Kashima, Kashii |
|
October |
Yamato, Musashi |
|
|
1944 |
May |
Nachi, Ashigara, Haguro, Myoko |
|
June |
Atago, Takao, Maya |
|
|
July |
Junyo, Oyodo, Noshiro, Yahagi - 2 sets in Noshiro and Yahagi |
|
|
August |
Amagi, Unryu |
|
|
October |
Nagato, Katsuragi - 2 sets in the latter |
|
|
November |
Sakawa - 2 sets |
|
|
1945 |
January |
Kitagami receives 2nd set |
The experimental installations on Oi and Kitagami were probably the first examples of Imperial Navy shipborne radar. They were also the only Japanese ships to begin the war with radar installed.
Destroyers And Light Warships
|
1942 |
March |
Kazegumo, Makigumo |
|
June |
Naganami |
|
|
July |
Akigumo, Yugumo |
|
|
August |
Makinami, Takanami |
|
|
December |
Onami |
|
|
1943 |
January |
Kiyonami |
|
March |
Tamanami |
|
|
July |
Fujinami, Hayanami, Suzunami |
|
|
October |
Hachijo, Hamanami, Ishigaki, Kunashiri, Shumushu |
|
|
November |
Asashimo |
|
|
December |
Kishinami, Okinami |
|
|
1944 |
February |
D2, D8, D10, Hayashimo |
|
March |
D4, D6, D12, D14, D16, D18, D20, D22,D24, Akishima |
|
|
May |
D26, D28, Kiyoshimo |
|
|
June |
Akebono, Amakusa, C1, C3, C5,C7, C9, C11, C13, C15, C17, C19, D30, D32, Etorofu, Fukue, Hibiki, Hiburi, Hirato, Kanju, Kasado, Manju, Matsuwa, Oki, Sado, Shikinami, Shimakze, Tsushima, Uranami, Ushio, Usugumo |
|
|
July |
C21, C25, C27, C43, Shonan, Uhuru |
|
|
August |
C29, C31, C33, D34, D38, D42, D44, D46, D130, Daito, Okinawa |
|
|
September |
C23, C39, C51, C61, D52, D54, D56, D132, D134, Kume |
|
|
October |
C35, C41, C63, C205, C207, D36, D50, D64, D66, D112, D138, Ikuna, Shinnan, Yaku |
|
|
November |
C37, C47, C49, C53, C67, D60, D68, D72, D144 |
|
|
December |
Aguni, C45, C55, C69, C81, C215, D40, D74, D76, D82, D84, D118, D150, Chikubu, Inagi, Shisaka |
|
|
1945 |
January |
C57, C219, D102, D104, D106, Habushi, Sakito |
|
February |
C59, C65, C213, D124, D154, D186, D190, D192, Kozu, Mokuto, Oga |
|
|
March |
C71, C77, D48, D126, D156, D194, D196, D198, Hodaka, Kanawa, Shiga |
|
|
April |
C73, C75, C221, D158, D200, Amami, Habuto, Ikara, Takane |
|
|
May |
C79, C85, C87, C225 |
|
|
June |
C227 |
|
|
July |
C95, C217, D202, D204, Ikino |
|
|
August |
C160 |
|
|
November |
D116 |
|
|
month unknown |
Kuga, Ugu |
|
Became Operational |
May 1945 |
|
War Status |
used operationally in war |
|
Installed |
shore line ground target type |
|
Purpose |
long range anti-air |
|
Wavelength |
600 cm |
|
Peak Output |
100 kw |
|
Transmitter |
parallel two wire |
|
Receiver |
UN-954 |
|
Detector |
n/a |
|
Detected |
aircraft, group at 360 km, single at 250 km |
|
Weight |
30000 kg |
|
Number Built |
2 |
|
Antennae |
unknown |
Not put into operational use because the Type 21 was coming into service, with a weight of less than 1/30th of the Type 14, it was considered more practical for field use, even though Type 21 detected aircraft at reduced ranges.
|
These 2 views of the superstructure of Ise taken after the war show the Type 21 aerial atop the main gun director |
![]() ![]() |
|
These 2 views of Aoba in sunken condition at Kure after the war show what may be a Type 21 radar aerial atop the foremast |
![]() ![]() |
|
Became Operational |
August 1943 |
|
War Status |
used operationally in war |
|
Installed |
surface ship |
|
Purpose |
anti-air, surface detection |
|
Wavelength |
150 cm |
|
Peak Output |
5 kw |
|
Transmitter |
parallel two wire |
|
Receiver |
UN-954 |
|
Detector |
RE-3 |
|
Detected |
aircraft, group at 100 km, single at 70 km, surface ship (large) 20 km |
|
Weight |
840 kg |
|
Number Built |
unknown, small number |
|
Antennae |
dipole array with mat type reflector, send and receive separate use |
Once source indicates only 1 set of this type built, but same source indicates it was installed on numerous ships. At least 30-40 sets built and used operationally. Type 21 was the first Japanese air search radar that was power rotated, previous models had to be hand cranked to rotate. It was also the first set that gave good enough target definition to obtain rough estimates of height.
Type 21 was known to have been installed on the following ships :
Major Ships
|
1942 |
April |
Ise |
|
1943 |
January |
Taiyo, Chuyo, Unyo |
|
November |
Kaiyo |
|
|
December |
Shinyo |
|
|
1944 |
May |
Nachi, Ashigara, Haguro, Myoko |
|
June |
Atago, Takao, Maya |
|
|
July |
Junyo, Oyodo |
|
|
August |
Amagi, Unryu |
|
|
October |
Nagato, Katsuragi - 2 sets in the latter |
Destroyers
|
1943 |
March |
Niitsuki |
|
May |
Wakatsuki |
|
|
June |
Akizuki, Hatsutsuki |
|
|
1944 |
March |
Shimotsuki |
|
May |
Fuyutsuki |
|
|
June |
Suzutsuki |
|
|
December |
Harutsuki, Yoitsuki |
|
|
1945 |
January |
Hanatsuki |
|
Natsutsuki |
Natsutsuki |
|
The shot of the escort Shonan in July 1944 shows the twin horns of the type 22 radar, abaft of the gun director part way up the foremast above it, one horn is slightly forward of the other |
![]() |
|
Became Operational |
Became Operational: September 1944, see notes below |
|
War Status |
wide operational use in war |
|
Installed |
surface ships, submarines |
|
Purpose |
anti-air, surface dectection and gunnery control |
|
Wavelength |
10 cm |
|
Peak Output |
2 kw |
|
Transmitter |
magnetron |
|
Receiver |
crystal |
|
Detector |
n/a |
|
Detected |
aircraft, group at 35 km, single at 17 km, surface ship (large) 34.5 km |
|
Weight |
surface ships 1320 kg, submarines 2140 kg |
|
Number Built |
300 |
|
Antennae |
horn type, send and receive separate use |
In wide use by mid-to late 1944, Type 22 radar, while not designed for gunnery control, provided moderately accurate data for this purpose. Type 22 was the the type of radar that was most widely employed aboard ships and subs. It is known to have been installed on the following vessels :
Major Ships
|
1942 |
October |
Kongo, Haruna, Hyuga |
|
1943 |
June |
Katori, Kashima, Kashii |
|
October |
Yamato, Musashi - 2 sets each |
|
|
1944 |
May |
Nachi, Ashigara, Haguro, Myoko - 2 sets each |
|
June |
Ise |
|
|
June |
Fuso, Yamashiro may possibly have had Type 22 radar installed at this time |
|
|
July |
Oyodo |
|
|
1945 |
January |
Kitagami |
Destroyers And Light Warships
|
1942 |
March |
Kazegumo, Makigumo |
|
June |
Hamakaze, Naganami |
|
|
July |
Akigumo, Yugumo |
|
|
August |
Makinami, Takanami |
|
|
December |
Onami |
|
|
1943 |
January |
Kiyonami |
|
March |
Niitsuki, Tamanami |
|
|
May |
Wakatsuki |
|
|
June |
Akizuki, Hatsutsuki |
|
|
July |
Fujinami, Hayanami, Suzunami |
|
|
October |
Hamanami |
|
|
November |
Asashimo |
|
|
December |
Kishinami, Okinami |
|
|
1944 |
February |
D2, D8, D10, Hayashimo |
|
March |
Akishima, D4, D6, D12, D14, D16, D18, D20, D22, D24, Shimotsuki |
|
|
April |
Matsu |
|
|
May |
D26, D28, Fuyutsuki, Kiyoshimo |
|
|
June |
Akebono, C1, C3, C5, C7, C9, C11, C13, C15, C17, C19, D30, D32, Hibiki, Hiburi, Isokaze, Momo, Nowaki, Shikinami, Shimakze, Shiranuhi, Suzutsuki, Take, Ume, Urakaze, Uranami, Ushio, Usugumo and Yukikaze |
|
|
July |
C21, C25, C27, C43 Kuwa, Shonan, Uhuru |
|
|
August |
C29, C31, C33, D34, D38, D42, D44, D46, D130 Daito, Kiri, Maki, Okinawa, Sugi |
|
|
September |
C23, C39, C51, C61, D52, D54, D56, D132, D134, Hinoki, Kashi, Kaya, Kume, Momi |
|
|
October |
C35, C41, C63, C205, C207, D36, D50, D64, D66, D112, D138, Ikuna, Kaede, Shinnan, Yaku |
|
|
November |
C37, C47, C49, C53, C67, D60, D68, D72, D144, Nara, Sakura, Tsubaki |
|
|
December |
Aguni, C45, C55, C69, C81, C215, D40, D74, D76, D82, D84, D118, D150, Chikubu, Harutsuki, Inagi, Keyaki, Shisaka, Yoitsuki |
|
|
1945 |
January |
C57, C219, D102, D104, D106, Habushi, Hanatsuki, Nire, Sakito, Tachibana, Yanagi |
|
February |
C59, C65, C213, D124, D154, D186, D190, D192, Kozu, Mokuto, Oga, Tsuta |
|
|
March |
C71, C77, D48, D126, D156, D194, D196, D198 Enoki, Hagi, Hodaka, Kaki, Kanawa, Nashi, Shiga, Shii, Sumire |
|
|
April |
Amami, C73, C75, C221, D158, D200 Habuto, Ikara, Kusunoki, Natsutsuki, Takane |
|
|
May |
C79, C85, C87, C225, Hatsuzakura, Kaba, Odake |
|
|
June |
C227, Hatsuyume, Iwo |
|
|
July |
C95, C217, D202, D204, Ikino |
|
|
August |
D160 |
|
|
November |
D116 |
|
|
month unknown |
Kuga, Uku |
Submarines
The only one of the subs listed that I am 100% certain carried radar is the I-58, the others shown almost certainly did. It is likely that other subs had Type 22 radar installed late in the war. The dates of installation for most of these ships are as of commissioning. Only I-54 and I-56 would have had it installed later in the subs named below.
|
1944 |
7 September |
I-58 |
|
16 December |
I-13 |
|
|
30 December |
I-400 |
|
|
late 1944 |
I-54, I-56 |
|
|
1945 |
8 January |
I-401 |
|
14 March |
I-15 |
|
|
24 July |
I-402 |
|
Captured G4M2 (Betty) in the markings of the Allied Tactical Air Intelligence Unit, the Yagi type antennae for the ASV radar is clearly visible protruding from the nose above the 7.7 mm machine gun, a second and smaller antennae can be seen on the rear fuselage protruding from about halfway between the 9 and 12 o'clock position of the UK roundel |
![]() |
|
Very difficult to see on this picture of a P1Y1 on a late war production line are the radar aerials, protruding from the nose and along the fuselage side through the Hinomaru |
![]() |
|
Became Operational |
August 1942 |
|
War Status |
used operationally in war |
|
Installed |
large flying boats, mid-sized attack planes (H8K, G4M2, P1Y, J1N1-S/11, J1N1-Sa/11a) |
|
Purpose |
air and surface search |
|
Wavelength |
200 cm |
|
Peak Output |
3 kw |
|
Transmitter |
parallel two wire |
|
Receiver |
UN-954 |
|
Detector |
n/a |
|
Detected |
aircraft, group at 100 km, single at 70 km |
|
Weight |
110 kg |
|
Number Built |
2000 |
|
Antennae |
Yagi type, send and receive common use |
This set probably did not come into common use until 1944. Prior to that time any sets in use were probably deployed on H8K flying boats.
|
Became Operational |
September 1944 |
|
War Status |
under preparation for practical use when war ended |
|
Installed |
four engine aircraft (H8K) |
|
Purpose |
air and surface search |
|
Wavelength |
200 cm |
|
Peak Output |
42 kw |
|
Transmitter |
parallel two wire |
|
Receiver |
UN-954 |
|
Detector |
n/a |
|
Detected |
aircraft, group at 100 km, single at 70 km |
|
Weight |
70 kg |
|
Number Built |
unknown |
|
Antennae |
Yagi type, send and receive common use |
|
The antennae for the radar on this B5N2/12 can be seen on the fuselage behind the Hinomaru, and on the wing leading edges, radar equipped planes of this type were used for ASW and patrol work, and not used as strike aircraft |
![]() |
|
This shot of a B6N2/12 after the war at Atsugi base near Tokyo shows the Yagi antennae protruding along the side of the rear fuselage, including from the Hinomaru |
![]() |
|
Became Operational |
October 1944 |
|
War Status |
experimental use |
|
Installed |
single engine 3 seat aircraft (B5N2/12 and E13A1b/11b ASW mods, B6N2/12, C6N1) |
|
Purpose |
air and surface search |
|
Wavelength |
120 cm |
|
Peak Output |
2 kw |
|
Transmitter |
parallel two wire |
|
Receiver |
UN-954 |
|
Detector |
n/a |
|
Detected |
aircraft, group at 70 km, single at 50 km |
|
Weight |
60 kg |
|
Number Built |
20 |
|
Antennae |
Yagi type, send and receive common use |
|
Not visible in this shot of the Q1W1/11 Tokai, Japan's only aircraft that was designed as a dedicated ASW patrol plane, are the antennae for the radar |
![]() |
|
This portion of drawing of the Tokai from "Japanese Aircraft of the Pacific War" by Rene Francillon (Naval Institute Press) shows the radar antennae nicely |
![]() |
|
Became Operational |
June 1945 |
|
War Status |
under preparation for practical use |
|
Installed |
single engine 3 seat aircraft (Q1W1/11 and Q2W2/21) |
|
Purpose |
air and surface search |
|
Wavelength |
200 cm |
|
Peak Output |
2 kw |
|
Transmitter |
parallel two wire |
|
Receiver |
UN-954 |
|
Detector |
n/a |
|
Detected |
aircraft, group at 70 km, single at 50 km |
|
Weight |
60 kg |
|
Number Built |
100 |
|
Antennae |
Yagi type, send and receive common use |
|
Became Operational |
August 1944 |
|
War Status |
not used |
|
Installed |
night fighters |
|
Purpose |
airborne detection and approach |
|
Wavelength |
25 kw |
|
Peak Output |
2 kw |
|
Transmitter |
cavity resonance |
|
Receiver |
2400 |
|
Detector |
n/a |
|
Detected |
aircraft 3 km, surface ship 10 km |
|
Weight |
70 kg |
|
Number Built |
100 |
|
Antennae |
Yagi type, send and receive separate use |
While records list this type as officially not used, I find it hard to believe that in the desperate circumstances of the late war that many of those 100 sets did not find their way into Gekko or Ginga night fighters. Would certainly employed in at least small numbers in experimental capacity. Probably had antennae similar to the Type N-6 sets as shown above.
|
While records show this type of set as not having been operationally used in the war, this photo seems to refute that, being of a J1N1-Sa/11a Gekko of the 302nd Kokutai, the small glass dome on the nose containing the centimetric radar, I am guessing that this is the Tama3 set and not the FD-2, as the latter used a Yagi type aerial |
![]() |
|
Became Operational |
July 1945 |
|
War Status |
under preparation for practical use (saw active use) |
|
Installed |
night fighters (J1N1-S/11 and J1N1-Sa/11a) |
|
Purpose |
airborne detection and approach |
|
Wavelength |
200 cm |
|
Peak Output |
3 kw |
|
Transmitter |
parallel two wire |
|
Receiver |
UN-954 |
|
Detector |
n/a |
|
Detected |
aircraft 3 km |
|
Weight |
70 kg |
|
Number Built |
10 |
|
Antennae |
send and receive common use |
As demonstrated in the picture, this type of set saw at least experimental deployment, and probably some operational use, even though records indicate it was still under preparation when the war ended.
While not actually radar, the Japanese were unique in being the first combatant to employ a MAD, or magnetic anomoly detector, system. These devices allowed an aircraft to fly low over the water (about 60' in this case), and detect the disturbance in the Earth's magnetic field made by a submerged submarine.
Such devices are a staple of modern ASW warfare. Luckily for the Allied submariners, intraservice rivalry prevented the Jikitanchiki (as the device was called), from being paired with the Army's Ka-1 Autogyro. This near helicopter like aircraft could indeed hover, and combined with the MAD system would have been an extremely effective weapon against Allied subs.
Since the Army had modified and employed a few Ka-1's expressly for ASW work on their merchant aircraft carrier the Akitsu Maru, it shows the depth of the dislike between the two Japanes service branches that this connection of sensor system and aircraft were never made. Had they done so, the Japanese would truly have become the fathers of modern anti-submarine warfare, as the helicopter and MAD combination is used throughout the world today, in combination with sonobuoys which were not developed until after WW II.
When late in the war the Army finally either received some Jikitanchiki sets from the Navy, or developed MAD gear of their own, no one in the Army saw the possibilities of combining the hovering Ka-1 (normally used for artillery fire control) with the MAD system. Instead the Army installed their MAD systems on Ki-49-I heavy bombers that had been replaced in front line service and modified for ASW duty.
|
Became Operational |
by mid-1944, in common use by late 1944 |
|
War Status |
used in war |
|
Installed |
Q1W1/11, Q2W2/21, B5N2/12 ASW mod, E13A1/11 and 11a ASW mod, Ki-49-I ASW mod |
|
Purpose |
detection of submarines |
|
Transmitter |
unknown |
|
Receiver |
unknown |
|
Detector |
unknown |
|
Detected |
submarines up to uknown depth, aircraft must be no more than 60' above water for Jikitanchiki to be effective |
|
Weight |
unknown |
|
Number Built |
unknown |
|
Antennae |
unknown, probably small numbers only |
While it appears that the ground based anti-aircraft units received small numbers of radar sets for gunnery control, no true gunnery control radar seems to have been used aboard ships. While the Type 22 provided reasonably accurate ranges for gunfire, it had been designed as a search radar, and was relatively short ranged to boot. The longer range dedicated gunfire control radars under development appear never to have been installed operationally on ships.
|
Became Operational |
August 1943 |
|
War Status |
used in war |
|
Installed |
ground anti-aircraft artillery |
|
Purpose |
anti-aircraft gunfire control |
|
Wavelength |
150 cm |
|
Peak Output |
13 kw |
|
Transmitter |
ring parallel two wire |
|
Receiver |
UN-954 |
|
Detector |
n/a |
|
Detected |
aircraft, group at 40 km, single at 20 km |
|
Weight |
5000 kg |
|
Number Built |
50 |
|
Antennae |
dipole array with mat type relector, send receive separate use |
|
Became Operational |
October 1944 |
|
War Status |
used in war |
|
Installed |
ground anti-aircraft artillery |
|
Purpose |
anti-aircraft gunfire control |
|
Wavelength |
150 cm |
|
Peak Output |
13 kw |
|
Transmitter |
ring parallel two wire |
|
Receiver |
UN-954 |
|
Detector |
n/a |
|
Detected |
aircraft, group at 40 km, single at 20 km |
|
Weight |
5000 kg |
|
Number Built |
60 |
|
Antennae |
Yagi type, send and receive separate use |
|
Became Operational |
July 1945 |
|
War Status |
used in war |
|
Installed |
ground searchlight units |
|
Purpose |
searchlight control |
|
Wavelength |
150 cm |
|
Peak Output |
13 kw |
|
Transmitter |
ring parallel two wire |
|
Receiver |
UN-954 |
|
Detector |
n/a |
|
Detected |
aircraft, group and single at 40 km |
|
Weight |
500 kg |
|
Number Built |
121 |
|
Antennae |
Yagi type, send and receive separate use |
|
Became Operational |
March 1944 |
|
War Status |
not used |
|
Installed |
surface ships cruiser or larger |
|
Purpose |
anti-surface ship gunfire control |
|
Wavelength |
60 cm |
|
Peak Output |
5 kw |
|
Transmitter |
cavity resonance |
|
Receiver |
2400 |
|
Detector |
n/a |
|
Detected |
small surface ships 13 km |
|
Weight |
1000 kg |
|
Number Built |
unknown |
|
Antennae |
parabola, send and receive common use |
|
Became Operational |
March 1945 |
|
War Status |
under preparation for practical use |
|
Installed |
ground shore batteries, surface ship cruiser size or larger |
|
Purpose |
anti-surface ship gunfire control |
|
Wavelength |
10 cm |
|
Peak Output |
2 kw |
|
Transmitter |
magnetron |
|
Receiver |
crystal |
|
Detector |
n/a |
|
Detected |
large surface ships 35 km |
|
Weight |
1000 kg |
|
Number Built |
unknown |
|
Antennae |
parabola, send and receive common use |
|
Became Operational |
September 1944 |
|
War Status |
under preparation for practical use |
|
Installed |
ground shore batteries, heavy cruisers and battleships |
|
Purpose |
anti-surface ship gunfire control |
|
Wavelength |
10 cm |
|
Peak Output |
2 kw |
|
Transmitter |
magnetron |
|
Receiver |
crystal |
|
Detector |
n/a |
|
Detected |
large surface ships 30 km |
|
Weight |
5000 kg |
|
Number Built |
60 |
|
Antennae |
square horn, send and receive separate use |
|
Became Operational |
August 1944 |
|
War Status |
not used |
|
Installed |
surface ships |
|
Purpose |
anti-surface ship gunfire control |
|
Wavelength |
10 cm |
|
Peak Output |
2 kw |
|
Transmitter |
magnetron |
|
Receiver |
crystal |
|
Detector |
n/a |
|
Detected |
small surface ship 13 km |
|
Weight |
800 kg |
|
Number Built |
unknown |
|
Antennae |
round horn, send and receive separate use |
Among the sets covered by this category are ESM warning receivers, which detected enemy use of radar rather than sending out active detection itself. While the models indicated here don't enter service until April or May of 1944, it is clear the the Imperial Navy had some type of shipboard detector used first in the Solomons in 1943 (possibly even as early as late 1942).
|
Became Operational |
April 1945 |
|
War Status |
under preparation for practical use |
|
Installed |
important ground area |
|
Purpose |
enemy aircraft height and position measurement |
|
Wavelength |
60 cm |
|
Peak Output |
10 kw |
|
Transmitter |
shielded oscillator |
|
Receiver |
2400 |
|
Detector |
n/a |
|
Detected |
single aircraft 130 km |
|
Weight |
15000 kg |
|
Number Built |
1 |
|
Antennae |
parabola, send and receive common use |
|
Became Operational |
June 1945 |
|
War Status |
under preparation for practical use |
|
Installed |
important ground area |
|
Purpose |
friendly aircraft position measurment |
|
Wavelength |
200 cm |
|
Peak Output |
10 kw |
|
Transmitter |
parallel two wire |
|
Receiver |
UN-954 |
|
Detector |
n/a |
|
Detected |
single aircraft 100+ km |
|
Weight |
3000 kg |
|
Number Built |
1 |
|
Antennae |
dipole array, send and receive common use |
|
Became Operational |
unknown, possibly never |
|
War Status |
under preparation for practical use |
|
Installed |
important ground area |
|
Purpose |
long distance enemy position measurement |
|
Wavelength |
300 cm |
|
Peak Output |
40 kw |
|
Transmitter |
parallel two wire |
|
Receiver |
UN-954 |
|
Detector |
RE-3 |
|
Detected |
single aircraft 160 km |
|
Weight |
8700 kg |
|
Number Built |
1 |
|
Antennae |
dipole array, send and receive common use |
|
Became Operational |
July 1945 |
|
War Status |
not used |
|
Installed |
shore installations |
|
Purpose |
special attack boat guidance |
|
Wavelength |
150 cm |
|
Peak Output |
13 kw |
|
Transmitter |
ring parallel two wire |
|
Receiver |
UN-954 |
|
Detector |
n/a |
|
Detected |
small surface ship/attack boat less than 20 km |
|
Weight |
500 kg |
|
Number Built |
unknown |
|
Antennae |
diplose array, send and receive common use |
The purpose being stated as "special attack boat guidance" indicates that these sets would probably have been installed near expected points of invasion to direct counterattacks by Shinyo suicide boats against the transports of a landing force.
|
Became Operational |
June 1945 |
|
War Status |
not used |
|
Installed |
all types of aircraft |
|
Purpose |
IFF general aircraft use |
|
Wavelength |
200 cm |
|
Peak Output |
0.05 kw |
|
Transmitter |
coil and capacitor |
|
Receiver |
UN-955 |
|
Detector |
n/a |
|
Detected |
100 km from a small surface ship/attack boat |
|
Weight |
10 kg |
|
Number Built |
100 |
|
Antennae |
bendback 1/4l |
|
Became Operational |
unknown, possibly never |
|
War Status |
not used |
|
Installed |
four engine bombers |
|
Purpose |
navigational?, target detection?, large bomber use |
|
Wavelength |
10 cm |
|
Peak Output |
6 kw |
|
Transmitter |
magnetron |
|
Receiver |
crystal |
|
Detector |
n/a |
|
Detected |
unknown, possibly earth or ocean surface search, 20 km |
|
Weight |
200 kg |
|
Number Built |
unknown |
|
Antennae |
parabola, send and receive common use |
|
Became Operational |
February 1945 |
|
War Status |
used in war |
|
Installed |
large flying boat (H8K2) |
|
Purpose |
low altitude radio altimeter |
|
Wavelength |
88 cm |
|
Peak Output |
0.0001 kw |
|
Transmitter |
parallel two wire |
|
Receiver |
UN-955 |
|
Detector |
n/a |
|
Detected |
earth or ocean surface .015 km |
|
Weight |
30 kg |
|
Number Built |
100 |
|
Antennae |
double T |
|
Became Operational |
April 1944, prototypes probably saw frontline use in Solomons Campaign |
|
War Status |
used in war |
|
Installed |
torpedo attack boat (destroyer) |
|
Purpose |
ESM warning indicator |
|
Wavelength |
75-400 cm |
|
Peak Output |
n/a |
|
Transmitter |
n/a |
|
Receiver |
UN-955 |
|
Detector |
n/a |
|
Detected |
enemy radar/radio use 300 km |
|
Weight |
40 kg |
|
Number Built |
2500 |
|
Antennae |
unknown |
|
Became Operational |
unknown, probably never |
|
War Status |
unknown, probably not used |
|
Installed |
ground, surface ship |
|
Purpose |
ESM warning indicator |
|
Wavelength |
3-75 cm |
|
Peak Output |
n/a |
|
Transmitter |
n/a |
|
Receiver |
unknown |
|
Detector |
n/a |
|
Detected |
enemy radar/radio use unknown range |
|
Weight |
unknown |
|
Number Built |
200 |
|
Antennae |
unknown |
|
Became Operational |
May 1944 |
|
War Status |
under preparation for practical use |
|
Installed |
bomber and reconnaissance aircraft (P1Y, G4M2, H8K2, etc.) |
|
Purpose |
airborne ESM warning indicator |
|
Wavelength |
45-370 cm |
|
Peak Output |
n/a |
|
Transmitter |
n/a |
|
Receiver |
UN-955 x 2 |
|
Detector |
n/a |
|
Detected |
enemy radar/radio use 300 km |
|
Weight |
20 kg |
|
Number Built |
300 |
|
Antennae |
unknown |
|
Became Operational |
May 1944 |
|
War Status |
under preparation for practical use |
|
Installed |
bomber and reconnaissance aircraft |
|
Purpose |
airborne ESM warning indicator |
|
Wavelength |
45-370 cm |
|
Peak Output |
n/a |
|
Transmitter |
n/a |
|
Receiver |
UN-955 x 2 |
|
Detector |
n/a |
|
Detected |
enemy radar/radio use 300 km |
|
Weight |
20 kg |
|
Number Built |
100 |
|
Antennae |
unknown |
30 different types of radar were built by the Japanese during WW II, with a total of 7256+ sets of all types built.
While the Japanese had been the first to develop radar among the major combatants, they were the last to enter into a serious effort to develop this important device for military purposes. As best I can tell, Imperial Army and Navy officers who were exposed to radar prior to the war failed to grasp its significance, and never bothered to press for its development. This lack of understanding what radar represented to wartime operations would cost the Japanese much in the way of lost aircraft, ships and men. Imagine for instance a Japanese carrier force at Midway warned by air search radar of the approach of the American dive bombers, and you can see how easily the course of critical battles might have been resolved more favorably to the Japanese if they had effective radar early in the war.
The other lacking that seems to have been prominent in the Japanese radar development effort is the failure to develop specialized radars such as the fighter direction radars carried aboard the American carriers. While the Japanese had a good program underway when the war ended, their lack of early effort meant that they were always behind the Allies in their advances. Japanese radar of 1945 was roughly equivalent to that employed by the US in 1942 and 1943, while at that point the Americans and British had advanced fire control radars in common service with both anti-ship and anti-air capability. By the end of the war the Americans were also expert in the use of radar to vector combat air patrol onto incoming attackers, making their fighters far more effective.
The Battle of Surigao Straight as part of the larger Leyte Gulf clash demostrates how devestating the lack of specialty control radars could be. The Japanese battleships Fuso and Yamashiro, escorted by a heavy cruiser and several destroyers came at a much stronger American force in a night battle that resulted in the Japanese being crushed with almost no damage to the US ships. The main advantage the Americans had outside of numbers was accurate, long range detection and fire control radars. This allowed the American ships to annihilate the Japanese force before it ever had a chance to seriously engage them.
|
|